Uitgeverij Paris × Close
Journal of Medical Law and Ethics (JMLE)
2019 / 1 (May) 1
 
  • Dr Sarah Christie - Academic Strategic Lead, The Law School, Robert Gordon University

    Advance Decisions, Dementia and Subsequent Inconsistent Behaviour: a Call for Greater Clarity in the Law online pdf
 
  • Peter Orji - School of Business and Law, University of Brighton, United Kingdom

    The Commodification of Body Parts of the Living – Looking Eastward to Go Westward? online pdf
 
  • André den Exter - Associate professor in health law and Jean Monnet chair EU health law, Erasmus School of Health Poli

    Dutch Health Insurance Dispute Resolution and Fake Courts online pdf
 
  • Nicola Glover-Thomas - Professor of Medical Law, Faculty of Humanities, School of Law, University of Manchester

    The Vaccination Debate in the UK: Compulsory Mandate Versus Voluntary Action in the War Against Infection online pdf
 
  • J. Steven Svoboda - Executive Director, Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, Peter W. Adler - Adjunct Professor of International Law at University of Massachusetts in Lowell, Massachusetts, Robert S. Van Howe - Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University Colleg

    Is Circumcision Unethical and Unlawful? A Response to Morris et al. online pdf

Dutch Health Insurance Dispute Resolution and Fake Courts

Toon als PDF
André den Exter - Associate professor in health law and Jean Monnet chair EU health law, Erasmus School of Health Poli*


The 2006 Dutch health insurance reforms introduced an alternative mechanism to settle disputes. This so-called “binding advice” is a binding third-party ruling to resolve disputes on the denial of coverage and the refusal to reimburse health services.

More than 12 years after it was introduced, the alternative dispute resolution (‘ADR’) regime gives reason for concern: legal criteria are interpreted differently by the ADR entity and the courts, thus causing inequalities in health care access under the Dutch Health Insurance Act. It is concluded that the privatisation of formal adjudication has largely frustrated citizens claiming access to medical technologies satisfying the ‘international medical science and practice’ test. It is therefore recommended that citizens opt out for the default option, challenging health insurance disputes in court.

Inloggen

wacht animatie

Wachtwoord vergeten?

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Om toegang te krijgen tot het gehele artikel heeft u een abonnement nodig. Meer informatie over de abonnementsvormen en prijzen kunt u hier vinden.

Abonneren op dit tijdschrift

Indien u een los artikel wilt bestellen, stuur een e-mail naar info@uitgeverijparis.nl